MacOS PPC S5R3 "power users" App 4.29 available

Odysseus
Odysseus
Joined: 17 Dec 05
Posts: 372
Credit: 19657731
RAC: 2486

RE: I will definitely leave

Message 78472 in response to message 78471

Quote:
I will definitely leave my G5 on the max setting from now on. I didn't think it made that much of a difference. I guess I was wrong about that.


I had mine on “Automatic� for the first few months I had it, until I discovered that it was generating huge numbers of errors in system.log:

(time) (computer name) kernel [0]: PowerMac11_2_SlewCtrlLoop::setVoltageSlewIndex - slew request timed out every few seconds, day in, day out, having filled about ten .gzip log archives by the time I noticed. These messages stopped when I switched to “Maximum�.

zombie67 [MM]
Joined: 10 Oct 06
Posts: 112
Credit: 452083989
RAC: 13111

Hmm. This app seems to run

Hmm. This app seems to run ~9% SLOWER on my G4 (1.25ghz iBook).

http://einsteinathome.org/host/770490/tasks

4.03 = 96,975.73 sec
4.29 = 105,410.10 sec

Reno, NV Team: SETI.USA

Bikeman (Heinz-Bernd Eggenstein)
Bikeman (Heinz-...
Moderator
Joined: 28 Aug 06
Posts: 3522
Credit: 691966179
RAC: 162470

RE: Hmm. This app seems to

Message 78474 in response to message 78473

Quote:

Hmm. This app seems to run ~9% SLOWER on my G4 (1.25ghz iBook).

http://einsteinathome.org/host/770490/tasks

4.03 = 96,975.73 sec
4.29 = 105,410.10 sec

The WU vary quite dramatically, but in a predictable way, in their runtime.

Mike Hewson et al have developed a good mathematical model and a nice tool to actually predict these variations, see this thread.

Using Mike's tool, it can be shown that the latest result (105 k sec) happens to be for almost the slowest WU possible, while the 4.03 result (97 k sec) should be among the fastest possible. Therefore it's quite possible (even likely) that 4.29 is actually faster than 4.03 for comparable WUs on your PC.

So maybe you want to continue using the new app a bit longer.

CU
Bikeman

MB Atlanos
MB Atlanos
Joined: 11 Feb 05
Posts: 30
Credit: 1758276
RAC: 0

RE: The WU vary quite

Message 78475 in response to message 78474

Quote:


The WU vary quite dramatically, but in a predictable way, in their runtime.

Mike Hewson et al have developed a good mathematical model and a nice tool to actually predict these variations, see this thread.

Using Mike's tool, it can be shown that the latest result (105 k sec) happens to be for almost the slowest WU possible, while the 4.03 result (97 k sec) should be among the fastest possible. Therefore it's quite possible (even likely) that 4.29 is actually faster than 4.03 for comparable WUs on your PC.

So maybe you want to continue using the new app a bit longer.

CU
Bikeman

Are these data from this Host enough for the mathmodel/tool you mentioned?

WU with 4.03: h1_0798.05_S5R2__143_S5R3a / 93,802.05 sec / 237.83 cr
WU with 4.29: h1_0788.45_S5R2__109_S5R3a / 81,070.51 sec / 237.40 cr
WU with 4.29: h1_0897.50_S5R3__488_S5R3b / 88,734.26 sec / 237.15 cr

Unfortunately the 4.03 WU is already deleted from the server.

Is there a real speedup with the new app?

6dj72cn8
6dj72cn8
Joined: 24 Jan 06
Posts: 24
Credit: 13321065
RAC: 0

Might there be another power

Message 78476 in response to message 78475

Might there be another power app, crafted to get the best from a G5, or is App 4.29 the best we can hope for in the foreseeable future? Thanks.

Bernd Machenschalk
Bernd Machenschalk
Moderator
Administrator
Joined: 15 Oct 04
Posts: 4274
Credit: 245371025
RAC: 11265

Well, I'm actually a bit

Well, I'm actually a bit behind with development on the PPC front. There's still room for improvement, but I currently don't know when I'll come to it in the next weeks.

BM

BM

Bernd Machenschalk
Bernd Machenschalk
Moderator
Administrator
Joined: 15 Oct 04
Posts: 4274
Credit: 245371025
RAC: 11265

The 4.29 is now part of the

The 4.29 is now part of the new 4.41 App (out for Beta Test).

BM

BM

picantecomputing
picantecomputing
Joined: 1 Jan 07
Posts: 10
Credit: 109837
RAC: 0

After shutting down BOINC,

After shutting down BOINC, copying the three files to the einstein.phys.uwm.edu directory, and restarting BOINC, I get this error:

"BOINC ownership or permissions are not set properly; please reinstall BOINC. (Error code -1202)"

Removing the three files from the directory and restarting BOINC fixes the problem. I've also seen this happen on a G5 when trying to install optimized SETI but was not able to solve that either.

Has anyone seen this happen or know how to correct? Thanks in advance.

P.S. G4 1.25 GHz 10.3.9

picantecomputing
picantecomputing
Joined: 1 Jan 07
Posts: 10
Credit: 109837
RAC: 0

Nevermind - found the answer

Nevermind - found the answer here. Changing the owner and group of the files as specified appears to have fixed the problem.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.