S5 results paper !

log in

Advanced search

Message boards : News : S5 results paper !

Author Message
Profile Marialessandra Papa
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 15 Oct 04
Posts: 7
Credit: 149,772
RAC: 0
Message 119437 - Posted: 4 Oct 2012, 12:58:35 UTC
Last modified: 4 Oct 2012, 19:26:34 UTC

Our paper http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.7176 got two positive referee reports from Physical Review D, the scientific journal that it is submitted to for publication :-)


M.Alessandra Papa, Project Scientist
____________

mitrichr
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 3 Nov 07
Posts: 27
Credit: 4,693,906
RAC: 0
Message 119454 - Posted: 4 Oct 2012, 22:45:49 UTC
Last modified: 4 Oct 2012, 22:46:36 UTC

Project results are always great news. We gave notice of your news at the ScienceSprings blog, http://sciencesprings.wordpress.com/2012/10/04/from-einsteinhome-our-paper-got-two-positive-referee-reports-from-physical-review-d-the-scientific-journal-that-it-is-submitted-to-for-publication/
____________
>>RSM
http://sciencesprings.wordpress.com
http://twitter.com/sciencesprings

Profile Yin Gang
Send message
Joined: 23 Feb 05
Posts: 53
Credit: 6,554,084
RAC: 0
Message 119460 - Posted: 5 Oct 2012, 2:37:40 UTC - in response to Message 119437.

Our paper http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.7176 got two positive referee reports from Physical Review D, the scientific journal that it is submitted to for publication :-)


M.Alessandra Papa, Project Scientist


Hi,

Would you please explain to us what the referee report is exactly? Does it mean that the paper will be published soon?
____________


Welcome To Team China!
Profile gdibble
Send message
Joined: 24 Jun 08
Posts: 2
Credit: 265,728
RAC: 0
Message 119462 - Posted: 5 Oct 2012, 4:39:34 UTC

GOOD JOB!!!! :D

My humble thanks to the entire team for their hard work!

Profile Marialessandra Papa
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 15 Oct 04
Posts: 7
Credit: 149,772
RAC: 0
Message 119463 - Posted: 5 Oct 2012, 5:26:40 UTC - in response to Message 119460.

Hi,

the scientific journal that we chose to publish the Einstein@Home search results in, has a peer review system in place, a sort of quality control system : the paper gets sent to a couple of independent scientists, the referees, who are experts in the field and have to judge whether the paper is interesting, correct and worthy of being published. As I said, the reviews from both referees were positive, which is a great satisfaction for us all on the project. We are now answering a few interesting questions that the referees had and expect final approval for publication from the journal shortly after.
____________

Profile Marialessandra Papa
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 15 Oct 04
Posts: 7
Credit: 149,772
RAC: 0
Message 119464 - Posted: 5 Oct 2012, 5:31:16 UTC - in response to Message 119462.

Our heartfelt thanks go to all the volunteers: they are the ones who made this result possible.
____________

mitrichr
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 3 Nov 07
Posts: 27
Credit: 4,693,906
RAC: 0
Message 119489 - Posted: 5 Oct 2012, 23:21:15 UTC - in response to Message 119437.
Last modified: 5 Oct 2012, 23:21:37 UTC

OMG!! Your Twitter notice of my blog post and/or folks reading here about the paper got so far over 50 views of the blog post in two days. Let me tell you, for Science that is huge!!
____________
>>RSM
http://sciencesprings.wordpress.com
http://twitter.com/sciencesprings

Profile MAGIC Quantum Mechanic
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 18 Jan 05
Posts: 1004
Credit: 227,310,302
RAC: 267,368
Message 119491 - Posted: 6 Oct 2012, 4:29:16 UTC - in response to Message 119489.

OMG!! Your Twitter notice of my blog post and/or folks reading here about the paper got so far over 50 views of the blog post in two days. Let me tell you, for Science that is huge!!



Yes I stop by there once in a while when I happen to see you around Richard.



____________
astro-marwil
Send message
Joined: 28 May 05
Posts: 317
Credit: 43,647,061
RAC: 39,187
Message 119493 - Posted: 6 Oct 2012, 6:38:22 UTC - in response to Message 119463.

Hallo!
Will the final version also available for download? Articles in Phys. Rev. D are normaly only available for reading and downloading for subscribers.

Kind regards an happy crunching
Martin
____________

mitrichr
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 3 Nov 07
Posts: 27
Credit: 4,693,906
RAC: 0
Message 119507 - Posted: 7 Oct 2012, 1:14:23 UTC - in response to Message 119491.

Magic!!
How are you? Long time.

Hope all is well.
____________
>>RSM
http://sciencesprings.wordpress.com
http://twitter.com/sciencesprings

KWSN-GMC-Peeper of the Castle Anthrax
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 6 Oct 05
Posts: 63
Credit: 33,168,221
RAC: 51,774
Message 119511 - Posted: 7 Oct 2012, 4:16:35 UTC

Bravo and Congratulations!
____________

Jack Jack
Send message
Joined: 28 Aug 11
Posts: 1
Credit: 167,192
RAC: 0
Message 119534 - Posted: 8 Oct 2012, 18:42:13 UTC - in response to Message 119464.

Please remember to list all contributors in the Acknowledgements section! :)

If CERN can do it so can we! You know how to spell my name, right? :P

Congrats.

StarryEyedSuzanne
Send message
Joined: 18 May 12
Posts: 1
Credit: 415,970
RAC: 0
Message 119569 - Posted: 12 Oct 2012, 13:11:59 UTC

What wonderful news. Congrats!

Grutte Pier [Wa Oars]~GP500
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 18 May 09
Posts: 39
Credit: 4,112,413
RAC: 2,384
Message 119577 - Posted: 13 Oct 2012, 14:44:53 UTC

nice, looking forward to a dumbed down interpertation for me, by the press.

astro-marwil
Send message
Joined: 28 May 05
Posts: 317
Credit: 43,647,061
RAC: 39,187
Message 119593 - Posted: 14 Oct 2012, 9:35:58 UTC - in response to Message 119577.
Last modified: 14 Oct 2012, 9:38:45 UTC

Hallo!
They have shown an increase in sensitivity by a factor of 3, just by the new algorithm. I think, this is astonishing. They have found now evidence for GW, but 8 candidates which have to be tested for now separately,
I think, these are the main results in the short.

Kind regards an happy crunching
Martin
____________

Profile Mike Hewson
Volunteer moderator
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 1 Dec 05
Posts: 4636
Credit: 39,774,469
RAC: 12,829
Message 119608 - Posted: 15 Oct 2012, 6:20:07 UTC - in response to Message 119593.
Last modified: 15 Oct 2012, 6:22:41 UTC

They have found now evidence for GW, but 8 candidates which have to be tested for now separately

There weren't any confirmed GW sources, just some candidate signals which later failed further tests. But it has shown how 'quiet' any sources need to be for us to have missed them.

Cheers, Mike.
____________
"I have made this letter longer than usual, because I lack the time to make it short." - Blaise Pascal
DaniloGravina
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 23 Aug 12
Posts: 2
Credit: 219,975
RAC: 449
Message 119732 - Posted: 24 Oct 2012, 18:21:28 UTC

Congratulations to all of us.
Hugs from Brazil!

Profile Dauxor
Send message
Joined: 26 Oct 12
Posts: 1
Credit: 397,980
RAC: 0
Message 119809 - Posted: 27 Oct 2012, 22:16:29 UTC - in response to Message 119732.

Congratulations to all of us.
Hugs from France!

Profile Stranger7777
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 17 Mar 05
Posts: 426
Credit: 164,554,174
RAC: 163,735
Message 120291 - Posted: 21 Nov 2012, 20:53:54 UTC

Congratulations to all of us.
Hugs from Russia!

Message boards : News : S5 results paper !


Home · Your account · Message boards

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grants PHY-1104902, PHY-1104617 and PHY-1105572 and by the Max Planck Gesellschaft (MPG). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the investigators and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF or the MPG.

Copyright © 2016 Bruce Allen