>As you can see... all around 1.9 - 2.5. Still thats QUITE a difference... and
>it does make you wonder why Predictor has on average 2.5 machines PER user...
>where CPDN only has 1.93.
No suprise that CPDN has one of the lowest host/users ratio, they have the hardest workunits. In my personal farm I have 6 computers only 2 of which can reasonably expect to run CPDN (so far neither has managed to complete a workunit BTW).
I am a little suprized SETI does not have the highest ratio since I thought they had the lowest requirements. Of course if it is based on granted credit that might make the difference. I feel like protien predictor has the highest validation percentage due to the homogenous redundancy.
> >As you can see... all around 1.9 - 2.5. Still thats QUITE a difference...
> and
> >it does make you wonder why Predictor has on average 2.5 machines PER
> user...
> >where CPDN only has 1.93.
>
> No suprise that CPDN has one of the lowest host/users ratio, they have the
> hardest workunits. In my personal farm I have 6 computers only 2 of which can
> reasonably expect to run CPDN (so far neither has managed to complete a
> workunit BTW).
>
> I am a little suprized SETI does not have the highest ratio since I thought
> they had the lowest requirements. Of course if it is based on granted credit
> that might make the difference. I feel like protien predictor has the highest
> validation percentage due to the homogenous redundancy.
>
Actually Predictor and I believe Einstein have lower requirements. 32MB RAM rather than 64MB RAM for S@H.
I believe that projects like Predictor have a higher host to user ratio since many people had detached during their extended outage and re-attached recently and due to server side software changes are unable to merge hosts. You will this occur on LHC as well.
>As you can see... all around
)
>As you can see... all around 1.9 - 2.5. Still thats QUITE a difference... and
>it does make you wonder why Predictor has on average 2.5 machines PER user...
>where CPDN only has 1.93.
No suprise that CPDN has one of the lowest host/users ratio, they have the hardest workunits. In my personal farm I have 6 computers only 2 of which can reasonably expect to run CPDN (so far neither has managed to complete a workunit BTW).
I am a little suprized SETI does not have the highest ratio since I thought they had the lowest requirements. Of course if it is based on granted credit that might make the difference. I feel like protien predictor has the highest validation percentage due to the homogenous redundancy.
BOINC WIKI
BOINCing since 2002/12/8
> >As you can see... all
)
> >As you can see... all around 1.9 - 2.5. Still thats QUITE a difference...
> and
> >it does make you wonder why Predictor has on average 2.5 machines PER
> user...
> >where CPDN only has 1.93.
>
> No suprise that CPDN has one of the lowest host/users ratio, they have the
> hardest workunits. In my personal farm I have 6 computers only 2 of which can
> reasonably expect to run CPDN (so far neither has managed to complete a
> workunit BTW).
>
> I am a little suprized SETI does not have the highest ratio since I thought
> they had the lowest requirements. Of course if it is based on granted credit
> that might make the difference. I feel like protien predictor has the highest
> validation percentage due to the homogenous redundancy.
>
Actually Predictor and I believe Einstein have lower requirements. 32MB RAM rather than 64MB RAM for S@H.
BOINC WIKI
New graphs from Zain. They're
)
New graphs from Zain. They're popping up everywhere!
http://www.setisynergy.com/stats/teams.php?project=eah
Team example
bump
)
bump
> bump > And a well timed
)
> bump
>
And a well timed bump 'twas.
Catch your own wave...
And bump again...
)
And bump again...
I believe that projects like
)
I believe that projects like Predictor have a higher host to user ratio since many people had detached during their extended outage and re-attached recently and due to server side software changes are unable to merge hosts. You will this occur on LHC as well.
Paul
a steady increase in users..
)
a steady increase in users..
Bump! and another one ;-)
)
Bump!
and another one ;-)
Grüße vom Sänger
