Help me optimize my system

jeffusa
jeffusa
Joined: 2 Jun 05
Posts: 22
Credit: 3386132
RAC: 0
Topic 193713

I have a Windows system running a 2.4 Ghz Core 2 Duo. I'm getting average of around 33k seconds for my workunits. It seems like my machines keeps getting smoked by Linux systems.

Is there an optimized client I could run for better performance?

Jord
Joined: 26 Jan 05
Posts: 2952
Credit: 5779100
RAC: 0

Help me optimize my system

Look at http://einsteinathome.org/node/193660 for the optimized version.

Mikie Tim T
Mikie Tim T
Joined: 22 Jan 05
Posts: 105
Credit: 263777741
RAC: 0

RE: I have a Windows system

Quote:

I have a Windows system running a 2.4 Ghz Core 2 Duo. I'm getting average of around 33k seconds for my workunits. It seems like my machines keeps getting smoked by Linux systems.

Is there an optimized client I could run for better performance?

See http://einstein.phys.uwm.edu/app_test.php#windows. That will get you in the same ballpark as the Linux systems, but don't expect miracles. Vista in general has more overhead than pretty much any Linux distribution, so on the same hardware, Linux will always be faster (except on the BOINC benchmarks for some reason). There's also an SSE2 Power App for Linux only currently that may be responsible for some of the faster processing of some of your Linux competition. There are no plans on making an SSE2 version for any other platform as they're focusing on creating the application for the next run on S5 data.

Zxian
Zxian
Joined: 23 Oct 06
Posts: 40
Credit: 5121474
RAC: 0

RE: That will get you in

Message 82131 in response to message 82130

Quote:
That will get you in the same ballpark as the Linux systems, but don't expect miracles. Vista in general has more overhead than pretty much any Linux distribution, so on the same hardware, Linux will always be faster (except on the BOINC benchmarks for some reason). There's also an SSE2 Power App for Linux only currently that may be responsible for some of the faster processing of some of your Linux competition. There are no plans on making an SSE2 version for any other platform as they're focusing on creating the application for the next run on S5 data.

Vista's "overhead" isn't enough cause to lower crunching runtimes. The time shown for WUs is the CPU time - not the start to finish time. Regardless of other processes that are running in the background, the actual work unit time should remain the same. That being said - a Vista system sitting at idle doesn't consume any more CPU cycles than XP does.

I've got the optimized clients running on a Windows XP 64-bit computer and a Fedora 9 64-bit computer. Both have pretty much the same hardware (Q6700, 4GB RAM) but the Windows machine has consistently lower WU runtimes.

@jeffusa - Grab yourself the Windows optimized client. You should get runtimes that drop below 20k.

jeffusa
jeffusa
Joined: 2 Jun 05
Posts: 22
Credit: 3386132
RAC: 0

I installed the optimized

I installed the optimized app. I was getting around 720 Average work done with the old app. I can't wait to see what the optimized app can do!

Zxian
Zxian
Joined: 23 Oct 06
Posts: 40
Credit: 5121474
RAC: 0

I had one of my old systems

I had one of my old systems overclocked to 2.4GHz, and it was pulling an average of 2000RAC. With your setup, you should be able to pull off similar numbers. :)

vraa
vraa
Joined: 24 Feb 08
Posts: 3
Credit: 8978855
RAC: 0

Is there a way through some

Is there a way through some remote place that I can push out the optimized app to all my hosts

Is it worth the time to do it?

Will the optimized apps be auto-deployed once they are out of 'beta' phase?

MarkJ
MarkJ
Joined: 28 Feb 08
Posts: 437
Credit: 138592881
RAC: 40703

RE: Is there a way through

Message 82135 in response to message 82134

Quote:

Is there a way through some remote place that I can push out the optimized app to all my hosts

Is it worth the time to do it?

Will the optimized apps be auto-deployed once they are out of 'beta' phase?

One of the drawbacks to optimized apps is they don't auto-update. The "stock" apps do.

When S5R4 comes along your S5R3 app will no longer be getting any work once all the wu are processed (approx 90 days according to the server status page). You will need a newer app for S5R4.

Bikeman (Heinz-Bernd Eggenstein)
Bikeman (Heinz-...
Moderator
Joined: 28 Aug 06
Posts: 3522
Credit: 692145560
RAC: 10036

The server status page

The server status page projection is a bit off, Bernd mentioned in another post that we can expect the transition to S5R4 already in August.

CU
H-B

Gary Roberts
Gary Roberts
Moderator
Joined: 9 Feb 05
Posts: 5858
Credit: 111386175404
RAC: 33777780

RE: Is there a way through

Message 82137 in response to message 82134

Quote:
Is there a way through some remote place that I can push out the optimized app to all my hosts

Deploying beta test and power user apps is quite simple if you have all your hosts on a LAN and you create a network share on one of them. Just unpack the contents of the beta test archive onto the network share. If you don't have a network share on a LAN you can use a pen (USB) drive instead.

From each host on which you want to run the beta app, you just need to

  • * Copy the archive contents to your host's ...\\BOINC\\projects\\einstein.phys.uwm.edu folder, overwriting any existing app_info.xml file
    * Stop the boinc client
    * Wait 5 seconds
    * Restart the BOINC client

The five seconds is important to make sure that BOINC has properly stopped before attempting to restart it. I have icons on the desktop for doing the job and I believe I've noticed a problem if I click the restart icon too soon after clicking the stop icon. I've never had a problem if I count to five :-).

The above is for Windows with BOINC running as a service but I do exactly the same for Linux anyway.

Quote:
Is it worth the time to do it?

The time per host is almost negligible. It mounts up if you are doing 100 hosts :-). If there is improved performance, that makes it quite worthwhile.

Quote:
Will the optimized apps be auto-deployed once they are out of 'beta' phase?

Quite often beta test apps will eventually become the next stock app by which time there is usually another beta or power user app in the works. The most common transition I do is from one beta to the next which is why I made the comment about allowing the app_info.xml app to be overwritten. It's actually a lot more difficult to go from a beta app to the stock app as you have to think about the tasks in your cache which have been "branded" with the version number of the previous beta.

There is no easy way for a new stock app to own these tasks once the app_info.xml file has gone. Just removing the app_info.xml file will make those "previously branded" tasks error out. Your only real option is to allow your cache to drain (or abort the excess tasks) before attempting to go back to a stock app.

A new beta will inherit them with no problem whatsoever, since the logic to do so is in the new app_info.xml file. Even partly crunched tasks are fine, as long as there is no change in the format of the checkpoint file. I'm sure Bernd will tell you if there is a change in checkpoint format. There hasn't been one for quite a while now.

Cheers,
Gary.

jeffusa
jeffusa
Joined: 2 Jun 05
Posts: 22
Credit: 3386132
RAC: 0

It looks like it is working.

It looks like it is working. My computer is showing 1522 average work done for BOINC. This is on a computer I use pretty heavily during the work week so I'm probably getting close to the max.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.